State v. Kinderman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Spinkellink's language precluding federal courts from reviewing state court application of capital sentencing criteria no longer valid
• concluding that Spinkellink’s language precluding federal courts from reviewing state court application of capital sentencing criteria no longer valid
• holding that \the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses applies to capital sentencing hearings\
• holding that a reviewing court cannot consider trial judge’s post-decision statements regarding mental processes in sentencing deliberations
• stating that, notwithstanding Williams, whether \the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses extends to capital sentencing proceedings has not been specifically addressed by the Supreme Court.\
• stating that defendant has right to be present at \all stages of a criminal trial\ guaranteed by U.S. Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).