State v. Kincaid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim of amnesia \alone ... does not automatically raise a bona fide or legitimate doubt triggering a due process right to a competency hearing\
• holding that arguments not briefed are waived on appeal
• Regarding amnesia claim, “assum[ing] without deciding, that the defendant has no memory of the accident . . . . That claim alone, however, does not automatically raise a bona fide doubt triggering a due process right to a competency hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Morris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-18· cited 107×
• State of New Hampshire v. Theadore Mitchell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-05-16· cited 8×
• State v. Decato
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-08-28· cited 5×
• Hull v. GRAFTON COUNTY
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-10-19· cited 1×
• Morris, Reginald Eugene
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-18
• State of New Hampshire v. Mohammad Salimullah
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-01-10