State v. Kilpatrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he sole real issue in the case is whether or not the testimony, if believed, would have been likely to change the result” and, where the new evidence created “a direct conflict in the testimony with respect to eyewitness identification,” it was likely to change the result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Disorbo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-11-23· cited 13×
• State v. Farmer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-01-31· cited 12×
• State v. Quiring
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-08-27· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• State v. Koennecke
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-29· cited 76×
• State v. Hockings
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-04-11· cited 53×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-05-07· cited 28×
• State v. Ellis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-09-06· cited 23×