State v. Kidwell
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4806
Syllabus
ALLIED OFFENSES – R.C. 2941.25 – DRUGS – SENTENCING: The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant to concurrent prison terms where the sentences fell within the available sentencing ranges for the offenses and were not contrary to law, in the absence of an affirmative demonstration to the contrary by defendant, the trial court's consideration of the statutory factors of R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 is presumed. Defendant's convictions for aggravated trafficking in drugs (tetrahydrocannabinol), trafficking in marihuana, and trafficking in hashish were not allied offenses of similar import, even though he possessed the three drugs at the same time, because multiple convictions relating to different controlled substances are not allied offenses of similar import and are not subject to merger.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-27· cited 118×
- State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-22· cited 23×
- State v. GiuggioOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-19· cited 6×
- State v. StuckeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.