State v. Kidd

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 762

Syllabus

Trial court's judgment entry ordered that defendant serve his sentence consecutively to a sentence already imposed by another county in another case, and it included the statutory findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). In the absence of a transcript, we presume the regularity of the sentencing hearing, including that the trial court orally made the necessary statutory findings at sentencing. With the record before us, the imposition of consecutive sentences was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.