Skip to main content

State v. Kidd

Citations

  • 239 N.W.2d 860
  • 1976 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that Iowa follows federal interpretation of rule 801 excluding admissions from the definition of hearsay
  • noting a party challenging admission of evidence on appeal “is limited . . . to the specific ground of his objection below”
  • adopting definition of hearsay in rule 801, Federal Rules of Evidence
  • “We have also followed [Federal Rule of Evidence] 801 insofar as it excludes admissions from the definition of hearsay.”
  • “It is not the purpose of the rule to exclude statements relating to the conspiracy uttered during the active [life] of the conspiracy under circumstances indicating reliability.”
  • “Repeated objections need not be made to the same class of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Uh-Lenhopp, Reynoldson, Harris, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.