State v. Khoshnaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where trial court denies a motion to suppress, we “review the record, and all inferences that it will support, in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings”
• evidence that an officer radioed for “wants” in the presence of the defendant, in the absence of any contradictory evidence, did not support conclusion that the defendant did not know that the officer was investigating him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-22· cited 22×