State v. KHOLSTININ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the defendant had not been charged under the concealment prong of the money-laundering statute, which the evidence may have been sufficient to prove, and reversing the defendant’s conviction under the prong of the statute under which he was charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).