State v. K.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding extension of search not justified by trooper’s “eight innocuous observations[,]” including such facts as name on rental agreement was not driver’s and no tools in car despite driver’s being carpenter
• tallying up multiple \innocuous observations . . . does not produce\ reasonable suspicion
• officer's knowledge that vehicle was rented by another individual did not support reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in drug-related activity
• eight innocuous observations made by police officer during routine traffic stop did not produce a sum of suspicion that justified further line of interrogation
• where driver stopped for speeding, inquiry should pertain to status of driver’s license and automobile registration
• ‘[t]he vice in interrogations and searches based on a hunch is their essentially random and arbitrary nature, a quality inconsistent, under constitutional norms . . . with a free and ordered society’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).