Skip to main content
· 3/30/1903

State v. Keziah

Citations

  • 110 La. 11
  • 34 So. 107
  • 1903 La. LEXIS 590

Syllabus

<p>CRIMINAL LAW-DISQUALIFICATION OF JUROR.</p> <p>1. If a juror in a criminal case, questioned on his voir dire, answers falsely as to his qualifications, defendant, ascertaining this fact for the first time after verdict, can urge disqualification as ground for a new trial, but he cannot do so if he has failed to interrogate him on the subject. He cannot urge as ground for reversal that it was the duty of the state officials to have protected him against the serving-on the jury of a disqualified juror by reason of his having been defended only by counsel assigned by the court. State v. Whitesides, 21 South. 540, 49 La. Ann. 352; State v. Arbuno, 30 South. 163, 105 La. 730.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

Judges: Nicholls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.