New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/22/2007

State v. Kent

Citations

918 A.2d 626
391 N.J. Super. 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying Crawford and Davis to conclude defendant was constitutionally entitled to cross examine declarants who prepared blood certificate and laboratory reports
reaffirming Renshaw and holding that the primary purpose of the certificate \was surely to preserve evidence for a future anticipated DWI prosecution\
reaffirming Renshaw and holding that the primary purpose of the certificate “was surely to preserve evidence for a future anticipated DWI prosecution”
applying Crawford and Davis to conclude defendant was constitutionally entitled to cross examine declarants who prepared blood certificate and laboratory reports
affirming DUI conviction where the defendant caused a single car accident and had watery, bloodshot eyes, and stumbled and slurred his A-1268-18T4 4 words
affirming DWI conviction where defendant caused a single car accident and officer observed that defendant's eyes were watery and bloodshot and that defendant stumbled and slurred his words

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, Collester and Sabatino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.