State v. Kelm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Cases involving the requirement of an intent to defraud under the old statute are irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-04-17· cited 5×
• Land v. Helmer
  D. New Jersey· 2012-02-08· cited 5×
• Greenberg v. Pryszlak
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-06-26· cited 3×
• State v. Kelm
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-07-11· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roth
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-02-07· cited 1,201×
• State v. O'DONNELL
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-10-25· cited 356×