State v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]ven where an expert does not explicitly vouch for the child victim’s credibility, a diagnosis of sexual abuse made in the absence of physical evidence constitutes impermissible vouching.”
• issue of reliability of child victim’s testimony “is essentially a question of credibility for the trier of fact to weigh in its deliberations rather than a question of admissibility for the court to determine in the first instance”
• so reviewing similar claim of error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-29· cited 5×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-18· cited 2×
• State v. Rhamy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-06