Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/22/1982
State v. Kelly
Citations
- 645 P.2d 1146
- 32 Wash. App. 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The decision to deny the defendant a continuance will be disturbed on appeal only upon a showing that the defendant was prejudiced.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ringold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-07-12· cited 52×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-01-14· cited 41×
- State v. PurdomWashington Supreme Court· 1986-09-25· cited 33×
- State v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-10· cited 31×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-07· cited 26×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-18· cited 24×
- State v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-30· cited 16×
- State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-05-28· cited 15×
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-16· cited 8×
- United States v. SeefriedDistrict of Columbia· 2022-10-29
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.