State v. Keith
Citations
- 197 N.E.3d 1023
- 2022 Ohio 3515
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in finding that appellant both refused to take a chemical drug test and operated his vehicle in violation of R.C. 2950.05(F)(1). There is no requirement under the statute that a refusal must occur within a two-hour time period. The state put forth sufficient evidence demonstrating that appellant explicitly refused to take a chemical test, as well as evidence that appellant was operating his vehicle where he was found in the driver's seat with the engine on and the key in the ignition, and admitted to driving to the location. Because the fact that a suspect refuses to take a chemical test is admissible, trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance for failing to suppress the refusal.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-10· cited 167×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-02· cited 56×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-09-14· cited 10×
- State v. WaymanOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-01· cited 7×
- State v. CraceOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.