State v. Keith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although Rule 106 is not an automatic rule of admissibility, we have held that a trial court may admit otherwise inadmissible evidence to counter a misleading advantage if a party has ‘opened the door’ to such evidence.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Iowa v. Vernon Lee Huser
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-05-05· cited 138×
• State v. Hoag
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2000-04-07· cited 18×
• State v. Warren
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-06-21· cited 17×
• State v. Botelho
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-12-24· cited 17×
• State of New Hampshire v. Ashley Hayward
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-08-15· cited 12×
• State v. Scovill
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-12-08· cited 9×
• State v. McSheehan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-05-11· cited 7×
• Charlie Willie Steven v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-11-09· cited 1×
• Amended July 17, 2017 State of Iowa v. Vernon Lee Huser
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-05-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Angel Pendas-Martinez and Andres Morrero-Laso
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-05-23· cited 80×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-07-08· cited 45×
• State v. Crosman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-10-04· cited 19×
• State v. Norgren
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-11-25· cited 4×