State v. Keith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating merely that “[w] e think that in the case at bar, as in [Counterman], the events proved at trial constituted a single transaction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Klokic
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-29· cited 58×
• State v. Witwer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-20· cited 15×
• State v. Latino
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-07· cited 11×
• State v. Carner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-30· cited 9×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-02-01· cited 7×
• State v. Terrazas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-05-02· cited 5×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-09-29· cited 4×
• State v. Dale
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-12-31· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hughes
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-04-06· cited 55×
• State v. Counterman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-01-29· cited 33×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-02-27· cited 21×
• State v. Elling
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-03-08· cited 14×
• State v. Waits
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-08-02· cited 11×
• State v. Cartwright
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-05-31· cited 7×
• State v. Hays
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-05-02· cited 7×
• State v. Andrus
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-04-05· cited 2×