Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1/19/1999

State v. Keen

Citations

996 S.W.2d 842
1999 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 45
1999 WL 16801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, despite a “bare” record, it was sufficient to reach the merits, but emphasizing the importance of including guilty plea transcript in appellate record
holding that confinement was properly ordered when a defendant had multiple felony and misdemeanor convictions and twice violated his probation
holding trial court’s ruling presumed correct in the absence of an adequate record on appeal
noting that a defendant’s rehabilitation potential and the risk of repeating criminal conduct are fundamental in determining whether probation is appropriate
finding that despite the absence of the transcript from the plea hearing, the record was sufficient to address the issue of sentencing
“[A] transcript of the guilty plea hearing is often (if not always) needed in order to conduct a proper review of the sentence imposed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John H. Peay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.