State v. Keel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts have the power to treat improperly filed appeals as petitions for writ of certiorari
• \conclud[ing] that the trial court was not required by any rule or statute to set forth detailed findings of fact in the written order granting the motion to suppress\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. T.T.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28· cited 23×
• State v. Sowers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-22· cited 6×
• State v. Houston
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-04· cited 2×
• State v. Gaiter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-13· cited 2×
• State v. Simmons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-04· cited 1×
• State v. TT
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28
• Torres-Carmona v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-01-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pettis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-21· cited 213×
• Judd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-12· cited 7×
• State v. Arriagada
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-27· cited 6×
• M. J. S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-06· cited 5×
• State v. Arriagada
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-21· cited 4×