State v. Kealaiki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[w]e could assert supervisory jurisdiction under HRS § 602-4 over the trial courts `to prevent and correct errors and abuses therein where no other remedy is expressly provided for by law'\
• recognizing that “[w]e could assert supervi sory jurisdiction under HRS § 602-4 over the trial courts ‘to prevent and correct errors and abuses therein where no other remedy is expressly provided for by law”’
• noting that “there is no conviction when the acceptance of ... a plea is deferred” (internal quotation marks and other citation omitted)
• noting that \there is no conviction when the acceptance of . . . a plea is deferred\ (internal quotation marks and other citation omitted)
• concluding that “[u]nder HRPP Rule 11(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).