State v. K.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting plaintiffs “Amendment to Compiaint” to supplement, rather than supersede, the original complaint because the “Amendment to Complaint” sought only to supptement plaintiffs prayer for relief
• dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, claims against individual agency officials because “[c]laims for alleged wrongful conduct by governmental officials in their official capacity are tort claims over which this court does not have jurisdiction,” and citing Bivens
• “Plaintiff has conceded that the obligations imposed on HUD under the RLPHRA, TSCA, and LPPPA are not dependent upon the contract and any alleged liability of the Government for violations thereof do not flow from HUD’s alleged breach of Section J of the Contraet[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).