Skip to main content
· 2/23/2016

State v. Kant

Citations

  • 2016 MT 42
  • 382 Mont. 239
  • 367 P.3d 726
  • 2016 Mont. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[rjegardless of the provisions of the [condominium] bylaws ... the bylaws cannot negate the applicability” of a controlling statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Cotter, McGRATH, Shea, Wheat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.