State v. Kane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “so long as the underlying records could have been admitted, it is not error to admit either a compilation of such records or testimony concerning such records, if the proponent establishes that the original records are too voluminous for easy court use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marisa Bavand v. Onewest Bank Fsb
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-11-28· cited 88×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-03-07· cited 63×
• Brandon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-11-07· cited 36×
• People v. Lugashi
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-10-27· cited 28×
• United States v. Hill
  U S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1982-07-02· cited 4×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-18