State v. Kananen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The consent [to a search] must be unequivocal and specific and freely and intel ligently given.”
• “The consent [to a search] must be unequivocal and specific and freely and intelligently given.”
• “In determining whether or not there was a consent, it is necessary that such a waiver or consent be proved by clear and positive evidence in unequivocal words or conduct expressing consent, and it must be established that there was no duress or coercion, actual or implied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).