Skip to main content
· 6/22/1994

State v. Kallin

Citations

  • 877 P.2d 138
  • 241 Utah Adv. Rep. 6
  • 1994 Utah LEXIS 44
  • 1994 WL 275954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that expert testimony describing relationship between “certain behavioral symptoms” and sexual abuse, “subject to appropriate limitations and instructions to the jury,” may assist the jury in giving proper weight to the evidence (emphasis added)
  • affirming the trial court’s admission of testimony that the “victim’s symptoms were ‘consistent with’ sexual abuse”
  • upholding trial court’s barring of evidence from expert witness on ground defense counsel failed to give prosecution adequate notice of intent to call expert to testify so that prosecution could arrange for expert rebuttal witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Zimmerman, Durham, Bench, Howe, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.