Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/24/1991
State v. Kaiser
Citations
- 469 N.W.2d 316
- 1991 WL 67113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a trial court “erred in refusing to let defendant testify in support of his contention that his attorney coerced the plea” and remanding for an evidentiary hearing
- noting that the issue was whether the defendant had been coerced into pleading guilty by his own attorney
- noting that “Kim rejected the approach of the pre-Kim decisions . . . that the [district] courts ought to be liberal and lenient in allowing defendants to withdraw guilty pleas before sentencing”
- remanding for rehearing and reconsideration under \fair and just\ standard where the district court failed to grant request to testify at hearing on presentence motion to withdraw plea
- remanding for rehearing and reconsideration under “fair and just” standard where the district court failed to grant request to testify at hearing on presentence motion to withdraw plea
- remanding for factual findings on claims alleged to give rise to manifest injustice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simonett, Gardebring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Butala v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-03· cited 67×
- State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-08-13· cited 57×
- State v. DanhSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-05-20· cited 34×
- State v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-09-13· cited 34×
- State v. Aviles-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-03-25· cited 20×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-04-08· cited 16×
- State v. WashburnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-11-09· cited 10×
- State v. TuttleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-08-03· cited 10×
- State v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-03-04· cited 7×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-12-10· cited 5×
- Berkow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-02-19· cited 2×
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.D.D. and D.A.A., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-09-17
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1978-12-11· cited 468×
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 145×
- Joon Kyu Kim v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-01-13· cited 72×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-12-22· cited 52×
- State v. DoughmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1983-12-07· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.