Skip to main content

State v. Kaiser

Citations

  • 469 N.W.2d 316
  • 1991 WL 67113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a trial court “erred in refusing to let defendant testify in support of his contention that his attorney coerced the plea” and remanding for an evidentiary hearing
  • noting that the issue was whether the defendant had been coerced into pleading guilty by his own attorney
  • noting that “Kim rejected the approach of the pre-Kim decisions . . . that the [district] courts ought to be liberal and lenient in allowing defendants to withdraw guilty pleas before sentencing”
  • remanding for rehearing and reconsideration under \fair and just\ standard where the district court failed to grant request to testify at hearing on presentence motion to withdraw plea
  • remanding for rehearing and reconsideration under “fair and just” standard where the district court failed to grant request to testify at hearing on presentence motion to withdraw plea
  • remanding for factual findings on claims alleged to give rise to manifest injustice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simonett, Gardebring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.