State v. Kahua Ranch, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring Board prospectively — after July 8, 1992 — to include quotations (not bare citations) from medical treatises if relying on those treatises
• BVA’s failure to cite to independent medical authority or to quote from recognized medical treatises to substantiate its conclusion precluded meaningful review by the Court
• BVA’s failure to quote from recognized medical treatises to substantiate its medical conclusion precludes meaningful review by the Court.
• medical treatises must be quoted in sufficient length so context is able to be determined
• Board must provide adequate quotation from any recognized medical treatise relied upon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).