State v. Kackley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] number of decisions have upheld the admission of [evidence of prior bad acts] in sex crime cases where the details of the plan for the prior crimes and the crime for which the defendant was on trial were ‘strikingly similar’ ”
• prior bad acts inadmissible when defendant’s act of placing victim’s hand on his penis leaves no room for an inference of innocence
• State may present the pretrial statements of child victims of sex crimes that are consistent with their trial testimony
• difficulty in application of law most acute in sex crime prosecutions
• no error to allow two witnesses to give cumulative testimony on same subject
• extending exception to cases involving sexual abuse of children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).