State v. K. L. H. (In re K. L. H.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he proper time to challenge the provisions of a prospectus is before bids are required to be submitted, in a pre-award bid protest”
• “The proper time to challenge the provisions of a prospectus is before bids are required to be submitted, in a pre-award bid protest.”
• “The proper time to challenge the provisions of a prospectus is before bids are required to be submitted, in a pre-award bid protest.”
• “[P]ure contract claims are not appropriate in a bid protest, even if clothed in the guise of a protest of an alleged statutory violation occurring in relation to a procurement.”
• “[T]he court is persuaded that pure contract claims are not appropriate in a bid protest, even if clothed in the guise of a protest of an alleged statutory violation occurring in relation to a procurement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).