Skip to main content
· 5/3/2017

State v. K. A. L.

Citations

  • 285 Or. App. 333
  • 396 P.3d 966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “an RO must not be placed in the anomalous position of reviewing the decision of the [Board], a superior tribunal”
  • “an RO must not be placed in the anomalous position of reviewing the decision of the [Board], a superior tribunal”
  • delayed subsuming resulted where the Board reopened a claim and reviewed the entire evidence before the RO on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.