State v. Justice
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 435
Syllabus
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying bail to appellant because the evidence presented by the State supports a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that the proof is evident or the presumption great that appellant committed the serious felony charges in the indictment, appellant poses a substantial risk of serious physical harm to persons or the community, and no release conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any person or the community if appellant were freed on bail. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Jamison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- State v. WilmothOhio Supreme Court· 1986-03-19· cited 145×
- Cooper v. MorinNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-12-19· cited 116×
- State v. Hoffman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-04· cited 97×
- Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court· 2005-10-12· cited 70×
- State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-04· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Sylvester v. Neal (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-08· cited 11×
- State v. NashOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.