State v. Jurgenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “error in the admission of evidence is not prejudicial where substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection”
• “[EJrror in the admission of evidence is not prejudicial where substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection”
• \[E]rror in the admission of evidence is not prejudicial where substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection\
• error in admitting evidence is not prejudicial when substantially the same evidence is already in the record without objection
• “[E]rror in the admission of evidence is not prejudicial where substantially the same evidence is in the record without objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).