State v. Junegain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the party making the record—an investigator—was known and available to testify; the investigative report could not be properly admitted as a business record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-03-06· cited 145×
• State v. Mills
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-04-01· cited 94×
• State v. Monroe
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-05-16· cited 45×
• State v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-04-11· cited 35×
• State v. Launey
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-06-21· cited 16×
• State v. Winston
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-02-28· cited 15×
• State v. Harrison
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1987-04-01· cited 8×
• State v. Namias
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-04-10· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-06-08· cited 115×
• State v. Pierre
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-02-21· cited 28×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-06-07· cited 24×
• State v. Graves
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-06-28· cited 23×
• State v. Gonzales
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-02-24· cited 16×
• State v. Varnado
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-03-31· cited 2×