Skip to main content

State v. Juarez

Citations

  • 489 P.3d 231
  • 2021 UT App 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • offering an illustrative hypothetical “in which a complaining witness was undoubtedly assaulted, as evidenced by obvious physical injuries, and the defendant defends the case not on the ground that no assault occurred but, instead, on the ground that he or she was not the assailant”
  • offering an illustrative hypothetical “in which a complaining witness was undoubtedly assaulted, as evidenced by obvious physical injuries, and the defendant defends the case not on the ground that no assault occurred but, instead, on the ground that he or she was not the assailant”
  • “statements by a trial court are perhaps most concerning, given that juries tend to view statements by the court as neutral and authoritative”
  • “[T]he context of the specific testimony in which the term ‘victim’ is used can make a difference . . . . [T]he identity of the speaker matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.