Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/1/2007
State v. J.S.
Citations
- 138 Wash. App. 882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an issue is moot when a court can no longer provide meaningful relief
- “An issue is moot when a court can no longer provide meaningful relief.”
- issue is moot when court can no longer provide meaningful relief
- regarding right to self-representation in involuntary civil commitment process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court· 1986-11-13· cited 448×
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court· 1972-04-27· cited 266×
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court· 2001-05-24· cited 256×
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 217×
- Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-21· cited 196×
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 150×
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-09-25· cited 115×
- State v. BreedloveCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-25· cited 72×
- State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-05· cited 54×
- State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-05-04· cited 47×
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-30· cited 42×
- Miller v. C.S.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 8×
- People v. Dennis D.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-02-11· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.