State v. Joy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an officer who observed a truck speed by him, and who left his jurisdiction while following the truck at an unusually high rate of speed, was \engaged in fresh pursuit of a suspected speeder\ and was authorized to make the stop under section 901.25
• “The fact that the patrol car’s speedometer was not calibrated is of no moment because an officer may stop a vehicle suspected of speeding based on the officer’s visual and aural perceptions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bost v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 65×
• Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Roberts
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-24· cited 11×
• State v. Allen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-04· cited 8×
• State v. Scott
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-11-23
• Galvin A. Gallardo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-02
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. MITCHELL REDDIN
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-12-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Potter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-21· cited 14×
• Cheatem v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-30· cited 12×
• State v. Sobrino
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-11· cited 7×
• State v. Eady
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-07· cited 5×
• State v. Carter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-05· cited 2×