Skip to main content

State v. Jose Luis Cortez

Citations

  • 482 S.W.3d 176
  • 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 11899
  • 2015 WL 7422784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because it was not easily discernable from a video whether defendant’s tires touched the fog line, the reviewing court was required to defer to the trial court’s interpretation of the events captured on the video
  • holding that because it was not easily discernable from a video whether defendant’s tires touched the fog line, the reviewing court was required to defer to the trial court’s interpretation of the events captured on the video

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Hancock, Pirtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Jose Luis Cortez

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.