Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/16/2020

State v. Jordan

Citations

2020 Ohio 4447

Syllabus

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – COUNSEL – CRIM.R. 44(A) – WAIVER – CONFRONTATION CLAUSE – SENTENCING – CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: Trial court did not err in allowing the defendant-appellant to proceed pro se at trial nor did it violate his confrontation clause rights the judgment was not against the sufficiency and weight of the evidence and the sentences imposed did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting the defendant’s invocation of “sovereign citizen” status by expressing his belief that the court was a fraud and his desire to be called “the beneficiary” rather than identifying himself
noting the defendant’s invocation of “sovereign citizen” status by expressing his belief that the court was a fraud and his desire to be called “the beneficiary” rather than identifying himself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.