State v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, by using a very specific meaning of the words “oral communication,” the legislature limited the reach of a statutory suppression remedy
• holding that, where a definitional statute expressly designates the statutes to which it applies, that definition is inapplicable to statutes not listed
• holding that, when a definitional statute expressly provides the statutes to which it applies, that definition is inapplicable to nonlisted statutes
• declining to reach suppression issue where the record does not “reflect whether the officers relied on their review of suppressed parts of the videotapes and, if so, to what extent”
• the defendant was recorded during questioning by police without being informed that the questioning was being recorded
• the defendant was recorded during questioning by police without being informed that the questioning was being recorded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sarich
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-11-01· cited 19×
• State v. Fries
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-25· cited 14×
• State v. Neff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-26· cited 8×
• State v. Nix
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-01· cited 6×
• State v. Rainey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-03· cited 5×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-05· cited 4×
• State v. Dye
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-06· cited 3×
• State v. Sager
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-04· cited 2×
• State v. Harris
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-04-28· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×