Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/15/1976
State v. Jones
Citations
- 27 Ariz. App. 180
- 552 P.2d 769
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It may well be that the appellant could have been charged with another and lesser crime such as theft, but he was not. The requirements for the crime of burglary, with which appellant was charged, were not satisfied in this case.”
- “It may well be that the appellant could have been charged with another and lesser crime such as theft, but he was not. The requirements for the crime of burglary, with which appellant was charged, were not satisfied in this case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Schroeder, Wren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1954-11-09· cited 57×
- NY Central RR v. RidgefieldNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1964-05-29· cited 21×
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Northern Assur. Co.Second Circuit· 1937-08-02· cited 6×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-12-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.