State v. Jones
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1936
Syllabus
Reagan Tokes confrontation clause testimonial hearsay excited utterance body camera. Defendant appealed his conviction and argues that the trial court erred by admitting video and audio recorded statements by the victim that constituted inadmissible testimonial hearsay. The court sustained this assignment of error finding that the video and audio recorded statements were given an hour after the assault, after the victim had left the area of the assault and the victim was in no further danger. Accordingly, those statements were given under circumstances that show they were testimonial statements under the Confrontation Clause and the admission of those statements was reversible error.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-09· cited 13×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-16· cited 8×
- State v. TorresOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-15· cited 1×
- State v. StakenOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-04
- State v. ChurchOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-20
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-08
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- State v. StahlOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-08· cited 189×
- State v. BowlegOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-03· cited 10×
- State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-02-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.