State v. Jones
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 81
Syllabus
RESTITUTION – VICTIM – MARSY'S LAW: Where defendant used a stolen credit card to deceive a business into delivering a service and the true owner of the credit card had the charges reversed, the trial court did not err in ordering defendant to pay restitution to the business: under Marsy's Law, Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 10a(D), the business was a victim for purposes of restitution because it suffered economic harm as a proximate result of defendant's criminal conduct.
Judges: Mock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. QueenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-24· cited 15×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-24· cited 5×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-25· cited 4×
- State ex rel. Suwalski v. PeelerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-08· cited 3×
- State v. CrosbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-31· cited 3×
- State v. GorleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-12· cited 1×
- State v. YangOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-28· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Allen (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-11-21· cited 13×
- State v. CartwrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-14· cited 8×
- State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-06· cited 8×
- State v. LynnOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 7×
- State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-18· cited 6×
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.