Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/14/2019

State v. Jones

Citations

2019 Ohio 3340

Syllabus

RECONSIDERATION – App.R. 26(A) postrelease control notifications nunc pro tunc entry underlying conviction is not void no obvious errors or issues demonstrated pro se application denied.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Fischer
Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
State v. Qualls
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 244×
State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 230×
State v. Sands
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-17· cited 10×
State v. Dardinger
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-26· cited 8×
State v. Wells
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-12· cited 6×
State v. Wells
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-21· cited 4×
State v. Rodriguez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-26· cited 2×
State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-10· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.