Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/23/2011
State v. Jones
Citations
- 250 P.3d 452
- 241 Or. App. 597
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 399
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the content of the officer’s questions about drugs and weapons, without any show of authority, did not cause the defendant to be seized
- rejecting defendant’s argument that, by virtue of asking defendant whether he possessed drugs or weapons, an officer was “implicitly accusing” him of criminal activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-22· cited 10×
- State v. AcunaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 9×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 8×
- State v. GravesWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-04· cited 7×
- State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 6×
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 5×
- State v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-01· cited 2×
- State v. WienerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-16· cited 2×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-11-16
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.