Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 464 N.W.2d 241
  • 1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 334
  • 1990 WL 207352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the victim’s testimony of prior sexual abuse was “sufficiently credibly and detailed” to constitute clear proof of the acts without corroboration
  • “Adding a corroboration requirement to our clear proof rules is not necessary to accomplish the purpose behind the rule when a victim’s testimony, standing alone, satisfies the requirement of clear proof.”
  • stating the district court has broad discretion in ruling on for cause challenges
  • victim’s testimony of prior instances of sexual abuse committed by defendant upon her is admissible
  • “Because the victim’s testimony constituted clear proof of the prior instances of sexual abuse, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to exclude the testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Schultz, Carter, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.