Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 707 So. 2d 975
  • 1998 WL 94646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that indigent defendant has no statutory right to having two attorneys in capital case
  • holding, although indigent defendant was represented by counsel retained by defendant’s father, he was eligible for state-funded necessary services
  • Where counsel was obtained at no cost to defendant, defendant could manage to retain counsel and the United States and Louisiana constitutions preclude counsel's removal
  • “[I]n some cases [a defendant] may not desire a second appointed counsel. In such a case, it would be unjust to require a defendant to accept appointed counsel along with his retained counsel.”
  • “[I]n some cases [a defendant] may not desire a second appointed counsel. In such a case, it would be unjust to require a defendant to accept appointed counsel along with his retained counsel.”
  • “Because there is no right to second counsel, because a defendant may oppose the appointment, and because other unforeseen reasons may weigh against appointment of second counsel, such an appointment is left to the discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.