Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 801 P.2d 263
  • 59 Wash. App. 744
  • 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing on vulnerability of victim, whether defendant knew or should have known of vulnerability, and whether vulnerability was a substantial factor
  • focusing on vulnerability of victim, whether defendant knew or should have known of vulnerability, and whether vulnerability was a substantial factor
  • affirming expert opinion where it was not based on an opinion of a witness' credibility but instead based on inferences from physical evidence
  • in manslaughter case, an expert's opinion based on physical evidence that injuries not accidental did not constitute inadmissible opinion on guilt
  • “Although the [experts’] conclusions touch on the ultimate issue, that in itself does not make the testimony inadmissible”
  • “[U]nder the facts and circumstances presented, the doctors were better qualified than jurors to adjudge the cause of death and whether the fatal blow was accidental or inflicted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.