State v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Every provision of a statute must be read in conjunction with the other provisions, giving meaning, if possible, to ‘each word, clause or sentence, considered in the light of the entire act itself and the purpose for which it was enacted into law.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-02· cited 5×
• Marriage of Doty-Perez v. Doty-Perez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-12-29· cited 4×
• United States v. Parada-Molina
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-19
• Sanchez v. Maricopa County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-12-07

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1950-11-13· cited 37×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-07-29· cited 28×