State v. Jolley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when a prosecutor misstates the law, the defense may object and request a curative instruction
• finding that whenever a prosecutor makes a misstatement of the law, the defense is free to object and ask for a curative instruction; a new trial may be warranted if there is a showing of prejudicial error due to the misstatement of law and failure to provide a curative instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matter of Linehan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 53×
• State v. Lockhart
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 29×
• State v. Persitz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 22×
• State v. Schreiber
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-01-16· cited 10×
• State v. McCuiston
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-04-12· cited 3×
• State v. Tze Thao
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-10-16· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Leland v. Oregon
  Supreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
• State v. Turnipseed
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-12· cited 104×
• State v. LaTourelle
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-20· cited 83×
• State v. Olson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-02-28· cited 69×
• State v. Larson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-05-25· cited 66×
• State v. Rawland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-06-30· cited 43×
• State v. Carlson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-23· cited 8×