Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/2/2019
State v. Johnston
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3127
Syllabus
Trial court did not err, where appellant's prison sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law, and the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, prior to imposing a sentence that was within the applicable statutory range.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. ConnorsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-27· cited 29×
- State v. GainesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-07· cited 14×
- State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 12×
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.