Skip to main content

State v. Johnston

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3127

Syllabus

Trial court did not err, where appellant's prison sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law, and the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, prior to imposing a sentence that was within the applicable statutory range.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.